|
Post by SKOT on Sept 19, 2008 6:12:07 GMT -5
No, no, no, no, no, Pam.
It was personal from day one.
This stuff is going on, indulged in by selfish persons, who callously reject other persons.
It is personal.
And the whole thing of the awfully vain choice of "lesbianism" is a deeply personal insult to all men.
And , don't forget, from the beginning.......right when I was met with all kinds of "f-off la" , "I wanna kick your b**ls", "you are scum", "we don't need men", "we can do what we want", "p**s off", "get lost","go die", "you're fugly", "small d**k", "you're a dog", "useless t**t", "motherf**king c**t", type stuff.....I always spoke about the cosmic, and the intimate....logic, reason, facts, and evidence......and emotion, soul and passion.
Why, this is wrong....and, how it hurts !
There is nothing that i could ever say, that could insult those getting into "lesbianism" enough!
You say you don't go on about your gender and ethnicity, even though you do briefly admit that you actually did bring that up first......but, you don't have to.
Being an Asian female means, that with no effort, you WILL get the automatic free ride through life. You brag about how women show more emotions than men.... Yes, the key word there is 'show'. It is easy to show superficiality. And often to manipulate things in your favour.
Men feel deeply. Our emotions are deep, and powerful.
And, sadly, ignored by a callous "society".
You claim women have it 'tougher'? Women's problems have been politicised though, 're-claimed'.
Try going bald Pam. Try sepending years being rejected, and being told to "get over it".
Working hard, with no happiness in return.
You mention the MIDDLE Pam!
My God ! Are you trying to be a total smar alec ?
EVERYWHERE I go, I carry a mahjong piece, with the Chinese character for middle on it !
I ALWAYS have spoken about balance......and you know it !
I have ALWAYS spoken about harmony.
I have ALWAYS spoken about union !
I have REPEATEDLY spoken about the MIDDLE way.
I AM that middle you're talking about.
I'm 6ft tall, I'm strong, fit and healthy.........and I am sensitive, soulful, passionate, creative, gentle, and deeply emotional.
I KNOW that something bad happened to you Pam, and I am terribly sorry for that. I KNOW that SOME men have done bad things. I haven't.....MOST men haven't !
I really don't know what you are referring to about "personal insults"? On all of these blogs , comment boards, and forums....I have weathered the worst of insults, and I know I must try and stomach them....because, ironically, the person in the right now, must be on their best behaviour...or else ... Whilst the rude, self indulgent libertines......dish out whatever insults they can come up with.....yet are still a "sophisticated" "minority"!?
And it burns me up....it's like swallowing acid....seeing this awful stuff going on......raising a voice against it.....copping torrents of abuse.....it hurts my heart.....it actually, physically, and emotionally...hurts my heart.
Pam, you have ALL REPEATEDLY INSULTED ME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And I weather that with a harshly beaten patience, and a tried spirit.
I have NOTHING to ""apologise"" for!
I'm the one IN THE RIGHT !!
ALL of this DOES directly concern me !
The choice of "lesbianism" is th WORST extreme of close-mindedness and blindness.
I am the ONLY one being courteous here.
And why bring up that bizareness about "paedophilia"? That is "sex" with a CHILD !
Do you consider yourself a 'child'......at 18/19?
Do you consider these young women, who are getting into a very jaded, tainted, worst kind of "adult" behaviour....as being now "children".
I'm 38, even just for the conversations sake......me getting together with an 18 or 19 year old would not qualify.....even by the most radical stretch of the imagination....as being "paedophilia" !!
The vain choice of "homosexuality"/"lesbianism" IS worse than child rape, though I will grant, not by much. Because child rape is an "event", a malicious, evil "event"....a corrupt act.
"homosexuality"/"lesbianism" attempts to position itself as a "lifestyle"......and insidiously destroys the very foundational fabric of human society !
SKOT
|
|
|
Post by Me on Sept 19, 2008 6:46:47 GMT -5
Skot, do you actually HAVE anything other than total BS about you being sensitive, caring, or what other crap? I'm sorry to start getting insulting but fact is, I've asked TWICE for your sources and still go on about Pam's? I TOLD you that if Pam's sources were invalid, FINE. I just asked you for YOUR sources, not about hers. She has provided sources, 'invalid' as they may be, but I have yet to see yours? Where are they?
|
|
|
Post by SKOT on Sept 19, 2008 7:44:00 GMT -5
ME ,
Sensitivity, and care......are never, ever, "BS".
There is an awful, insincere frost taking over too much of the world now....and too many of your friends.
Sensitivity, and Care.....are never "BS".....I would've expected you to know that.
I've told you my sources, ME. And they actually include your...and all of you'rs...minds, souls, hearts, and consciences.
My sources......
Do you really want me to compile a list of every religious scripture? Theological, spiritual, and mystical book? History book? Medical book and journal? Scientific book, manuscript, and journal? Cultural, sociological and anthropological book? Countless textbooks, websites, essays, studies?
I'm drawing on sources. Pam is fabricating excuses. And Samantha and the others actually mindlessly indulging in "queerness"....are deafeningly quiet !
SKOT
|
|
|
Post by Pam on Sept 19, 2008 7:44:10 GMT -5
Hi!
Now that we're done with the "Pity Me" part, can we get to the real debate here?
Points to note:
>I was referring to the MSN Convo we had if you cant remember, ref. to child rapist and how you believe that homosexuality is WORSE than raping a child. I'd like you to justify that. Coz I think that your perception is so skewed that you're the only one who believes that.
> By saying that just because I'm pretty. asian. a girl etc, I get away with anything, and that life's a breeze, is a direct slap in the face for all I've had to work for. I do not ask and things fall onto my lap just like that. I did not endure 6 years of racism to assert my own identity for somebody like you to take it all away, by saying that I have it so easy.
> I mentioned that stop generalising rule didn't I? Lots of times now. Can we follow it?
> I don't see how blowing your own horn will really help the debate. Nobody will side you JUST BECAUSE you're whatever you say you are, and nobody will side me JUST BECAUSE I'm who I say I am.
> I made a reference to the middle, since, as you so believe in it, you ought to be able to see that not all men are wretched creatures, just like not all women are bitches. But hey, if you want to twist concepts around to suit your needs, be my guest. We can ALL see it, rest assured.
> STILL awaiting that essay... And your last post. Unacceptable. No proper structure, no proper flow, lack of proper english, redundancies abound. You claim to be learned, surely an essay, which most singaporeans practice at since age 10, should be easy for you.
So, yeah, all the "Pity Me, I am the Only Matyr for the Right, And I'm Being Shamelessly Abused By Homosexual Teens From The Horrors Of The Web" is out of the way, and I have pointed out repeatedly that your "Listen To Me Because I Have Been Hurt And Its Personal Now, And I Have No Proof Or I Will Not Cite Any Source Because You All Know, DEEP INSIDE!" way of arguing is not gonna work. Can we have that essay now?
I'll be waiting for an intelligent answer.
Thanks to 'Me' for reminding our dear SKOT that he has not yet ventured outside the realm of the typical 5 year old kid "I'm right coz I say I am! Listen to me!" ideas.
WAITING FOR THAT INTELLIGENT ESSAY STILL!
Regards,
Pam
|
|
|
Post by Me on Sept 19, 2008 7:46:33 GMT -5
Skot, in your post you mentioned this: Do you really want me to compile a list of every religious scripture? Theological, spiritual, and mystical book? History book? Medical book and journal? Scientific book, manuscript, and journal? Cultural, sociological and anthropological book? Countless textbooks, websites, essays, studies?
My answer: YES! Hell yes, please state EVERY single one if you have to. State the books, the locations, hell even the exact phrases so that even if I don't recognize it I can go look it up.
Awaiting your response.
|
|
|
Post by Pam on Sept 19, 2008 7:47:21 GMT -5
ME , Sensitivity, and care......are never, ever, "BS". There is an awful, insincere frost taking over too much of the world now....and too many of your friends. Sensitivity, and Care.....are never "BS".....I would've expected you to know that. I've told you my sources, ME. And they actually include your...and all of you'rs...minds, souls, hearts, and consciences. My sources...... Do you really want me to compile a list of every religious scripture? Theological, spiritual, and mystical book? History book? Medical book and journal? Scientific book, manuscript, and journal? Cultural, sociological and anthropological book? Countless textbooks, websites, essays, studies? I'm drawing on sources. Pam is fabricating excuses. And Samantha and the others actually mindlessly indulging in "queerness"....are deafeningly quiet ! SKOT I will tell you things as they stand: > SKOT Claims of knowing a VAST amount of sources and yet, refuses to share with us, a FEW of those sources, and expects us to blindly believe him. Moreover, he mocks my hastily researched source even though he provided none himself. I have repeatedly asked him for an intelligent essay. > I'm rebutting his points one by one, and fortifying my own. Last time I checked, its called "Debate" and not "Making Excuses" > Lastly, they're probably quiet coz they can't be bothered to deal with you. Have a nice day.
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Sept 19, 2008 15:29:10 GMT -5
I take my hat off to Pam for having the patience to explain to Skot and everyone who is reading this her point of view instead of making groundless claims. I take my hat off to Pam for being completely into men and yet able to understand and appreciate homosexuals. I take my hat off to Pam for taking time to know me, to understand my relationship with my partner and to love me just as I am. I can never say the same to you, Skot, because you will never be what Pam is no matter how right you might make yourself sound. Right now, it's not about who's right and who's not. I would much rather spend a whole load of time hanging out at Pam's house doing absolutely nothing and just having her company than to even read through every word that you have said. Love, Sam. To Pam: I would really love to! It's a good way to kill time, but I don't think I'll be needing to kill time very soon, been actively making videos that I know everyone loves to watch!
|
|
|
Post by SKOT on Sept 19, 2008 20:17:47 GMT -5
Oh, good grief !!
The extent to which self absorbed arrogance takes people!
Samantha, most crucially....NO-ONE "is" "homosexual" !
Though that phrase is hoped to add an official air, it does not conceal the depravity.
And, YOU YOURSELF, have said thath you, and the others adopting this 'lifestyle' originally were straight, and dated and loved those of your complimentary gender.
Before this new obsession with your own gender took over.
Funny too, that Pam is described as being completely into men......yet you ascribe yourselves this official title....."homosexuals". As though you are a superior elite, divorced from wider humanity.
You're not.
And, as I have already said before.......though the phrase "homo- same sexuality" is applied now to everyone so vain and callous as to arrogantly obsess with their own gender.......'homosexual' usually, in the vernacular, means ""gay"""men"................what you're doing is ""lesbianism""......are far more disgusting, ugly sounding word.....that fits the reprehensible behaviour.
And, anyway, it's not so surprising that many females, like Pam "understand" and "appreciate" "homosexuals".............it can be much easier for them, and they're still invited to the parties!
Now....what is there that is supposed to be "understand" about "homosexuals"? Here's what's to be "understood"...........it is vain, elitist, selfish, irresponsible behaviour, indulged in by insensitive, arrogant libertines................nothing so amazingly 'profound' as needing to be "understood". And definitely nothing to "appreciate".
Your "relationship" with your "partner"? Sounds so formal, doesn't it? Like a legal firm. A "partnership".........that is because it is unnatural, immoral, unemotional, and spiritually defunct. The forced 'partnership' of like and like. It can never be harmonious, never soulful, never a true union.
And, tragicaly, this kind of language has entered into wider use.......you actually have many husbands and wives now referring to each other as "partners"........as the corrosive influence of "homosexuality", and the corrupting presure of the "pink dollar" wields terrible affects.
You say that Pam loves you "just the way I am". Now, you all went to high school together, right? So, of course, Pam loved you the way you were meant to be then, when you still loved boys.....but has now been duped into "understanding" and "loving" the way you "am" right now. Which isn't actually, good!
If you decide to get into drugs, or robbery, should she "appreciate" and "love" you, the way you "are" ?
The way you are "living" now Samantha, is wrong, and it is NOT , "the way you are"!
Sadly, right now Samantha............you don't know anything at all about love. Arrogance, vanity, self obsession, unnatural "partnerships", conceit and ignorance.......do not add up to a rough approximation of love !!
And Pam, you are making excuses.........................because every one of your hastily cobbled together "sources", are ALL pitched at the level of - yes, this a bad thing, but there are some bad precedents to this bad thing. Nothing, that you source from, actually provides any reason for, nor even a viable excuse for, people indulging in "homosexuality"!
Samantha, it is about right and wrong.
And I am right.
SKOT
|
|
|
Post by Me on Sept 19, 2008 22:29:20 GMT -5
Skot, still waiting for those sources.. We already know Pam's sources are cobbled together, where's your well-put-together sources? Stop saying things unti you can prove it otherwise we'll just argue ourselves hoarse.
Sources?
|
|
|
Post by Pam on Sept 19, 2008 23:08:36 GMT -5
*Twiddle Thumbs* I don't even know why I bother to make new posts. I ought to just copy paste my previous posts! [glow=red,2,300] > WAITING FOR THAT ESSAY SKOTY-BOY!
> STOP PRETENDING THAT YOU KNOW ME!
> STOP GENERALISING AND MAKING PROOFLESS CLAIMS
[/glow] Hopefully somebody will see that now. Maybe I didn't make it clearer before. But oh wait! I think this is like, the 5th time I repeated myself. FYI, When I knew Samantha, I already knew she was bisexual. I have some friends in the UK BEFORE I even met Sam, and I knew THEY were Homosexual from the start. Just telling you, so you can stop making assumptions and looking stupid ^^. I don't get "Duped" easily. Its like that, people with a brain rarely gets duped. Anyways, As we can see, SKOT continues to argue against lesbianism, in a way that doesn't include source. He expects all readers to just blindly trust in what he says is correct, because "DEEEEEEEP Inside Each Of Us, We Know The Truth". Weird, they never covered innate knowledge/enlightening in my psychology seminar. I must speak to the lecturer about that. Its Absurd! To leave such a topic out! WE MUST COMPLAIN! Oh wait. What if its not scientifically proven. Oh, then I better not raise all hell to the Psychological Board. Better not create a fuss based on my personal opinion, hearsay, and no proof. I'll look like and Idiot won't I?! Good grief! That must not happen! So yeah, back to topic. SKOT has, so far: - Provided 'Proof' in the way of 'every [insert subject here] text known to mankind' without even listing a FEW of those sources. Surely a learned man knows how important sources are. - Ignores practically all my posts, and jumps into the fray because of the small Post Sam made. And renewed his rage in going against lesbianism. Again, with baseless claims, and all personal opinion, AND picking and choosing what he wants, to bend to his own agenda. - Puts words, experiences and feelings into me. I don't like that. I've my own words, experiences and feelings. I express myself when I need to. I don't need him to add a superficial layer to who I am. - His most common basis and proof of why we ought to listen to him, is because he 'is right'. (BTW. BREAKING NEWS! THE SKY IS GREEN! IT IS! BECAUSE I SAY SO AND I AM RIGHT! THE SKY IS GREEEEEN!) - Claimed to have a big compassionate heart, and yet, is unable to grasp the idea that homosexuals have their own heartbreak and ostracising from society. He is unable to go about this in a way that is expected of a gentle being. Understanding and counselling. He doesn't do that. He just screams and expect you to believe. ==> Some Rebuttals <== "Funny too, that Pam is described as being completely into men......yet you ascribe yourselves this official title....."homosexuals". As though you are a superior elite, divorced from wider humanity."How did that conclusion get drawn btw? I just find it weird, that you can dragged the fact that I'm heterosexual, into the blog title, into the fact that we think that homos are a superior being? Really? Did I miss the linking somewhere? . If you decide to get into drugs, or robbery, should she "appreciate" and "love" you, the way you "are" ?Answer: Yes, With every inch of my soul, because I know that she won't do something like that unless something was VERY VERY Wrong. I'd go down, and talk to her, understand her, and attempt to fix things. But maybe you don't know anything about friendship.... "they're still invited to the parties!"I don't party. Very rarely. I'm more of the stay-at-home-with-a-good-book-and-avoid-the-crowd type. Like I said, you don't know me. Stop acting like you do, you'll look like a fool. Oh, and I don't get invited to much parties, coz my friends know I'm more of the home type. We either have outings to spend quality time, or I get invites to important parties, like birthdays and weddings. ==> End Of Rebuttals <== So, we compare SKOT, who still haven't given that essay. And who's now trying to undermine me as a delusional youth JUST BECAUSE I don't agree with him in the extermination of Homosexuals (Wait, its not even HOMOSEXUALS, its LESBIANS. Where has all the gay gone? They have the hottest bods...), and claims to be on his best behaviour and shown extreme courtesy on this forum, and yet, subtly (and not so subtly) mocks us and makes generalisation to make us appear worse. Wow. Great behaviour indeed! Then. we draw a line back to Myself and "Me The Nerd" and we'll see that we have tirelessly rebutted HIS points, asked him for PROOF (coz like, we can't exactly keep rebutting without proof...) and we're fortifying our own points. That its not about whether its wrong or right, because WE cannot judge that. Only God Can. its about LOVE between HUMAN BEINGS. I'll let the readers draw their own conclusion on their own points of view. I don't want anybody to blindly follow my ideas, nor to blindly follow Skot's ideas. Everybody's unique, shaped by our individual experiences and background. Simply just read and come to your own conclusion. ~ Pammy Oh, and SKOT, you must have read wrongly. Kindly read ALL my posts again, properly. My basis of argument is that Homosexuality (and sometimes, Promiscuity) has always been rampant in human Society since forever. Hence, we cannot say whether it is right or wrong simply because its been there for the past few millenia, and the only one who can pass judgement is GOD. However, we can say that its love. Love between Human Beings. Hence, shouldn't humans have a choice in who they love? (or are you still in the arranged marriage mindset?). Hence, Homosexuals are getting ostracised enough, and I don't see why you have to come in here with your closed mind, and start forum/blog blasting every homosexual you see. That's my basis of arguement. Kindly do not sprout out any more "ITS RIGHT COZ I SAY IT IS" and provide us with text and proof on why it is. Still awaiting that essay of yours.
|
|
|
Post by SKOT on Sept 20, 2008 1:21:03 GMT -5
No , all wrong.
Once again.
All wrong, from an easily duped girl, who does know that she can say anything, and 'get away' with it.
Yeah, go consult with your psychology lecturers. What they don't know is the astounding thing.
You actually are so full of venom, spite, and the will to ignore..............that you will actually attempt to deny innate knowledge in human beings ?
And enlightenment ?!
You mention baseless, vague, androgynous "love" between human beings ? 'Funny' how those human beings rarely actually inhabit a male body though, hmmmmmm?
OR, are you saying that next time these girls fall in love it may well be with a male human being ?
Alas though, none of those male human beings are allowed into 'herstory', or 'play' (except, albeit, if they follow very strict rules)
No Pam . . . . . .NO-ONE "is" a "homosexual".
It is acute vanity . . . . ..and those so eager to stick cruelly with their own gender take great, malicious glee in ostracising those not in their gender.
So, any ill will directed towards those becoming "homosexuals", any 'grief' they get . . . . .is 100%, totally deserved.
And Samantha was not "bisexual" when you met her. And those people you knew in the U.K were not "always" "homosexual".
AND it's "funny"........why don't you have the sincere talk with Samantha about what she's doing now, and try and fix things.......because what she's doing now IS REALLY REALLY WRONG.
A real friend DOES stop their friend when they are doing wrong.
This short sighted garbage you've been duped into spouting about "love" between human beings, and only God judging, means that you are also tacitly giving the green light to incest.....people committing that often "love" each other......and who are you to judge them Pam, and even to child molestation, the people committing that often profess "love", and who are you now to judge them Pam?
Pam, the vain, homogenised, biased, elitist choice of " S A M E sex" behaviour is the WORST extreme of a closed mind, and heart.
"Love"..........the misunderstanding of 'love' , is NEVER an excuse.
There are men and women created , for a reason.
And real, proper, complete love , is ONLY between a woman and man.
SKOT
|
|
|
Post by Pam on Sept 20, 2008 8:03:07 GMT -5
Kindly stop acting like you know me. I was not 'duped'. I've come to support my friends, just like they would support me.
I understand the full implications of homosexuality, and I do believe in my strength of character that I will not blindly follow the crowd for the sake of 'fitting in'. In fact, I try to be different, to establish a sense of self identity. I'd thank you to stop repeating YOUR theory that I was lead on, or any such implications.
Innate knowledge has yet to be proven. Genie, a 'feral child' in USA, was of great psychological importance, as she was isolated from human communication for 13 years. She does not show "Innate Knowledge" of anything sexual. She does not speak. She does not find the need to communicate. Don't talk to us about innate knowledge until you have PROOF. Genie is proof that the human mind is delicate, and studies with her enlightened the psychological field. (BTW, if you want to discredit the psychological field of studies by how much they "don't know", then why cite Psychology as a source? Contradictory much?)
There are no proof given by SKOT, and that his only rebuttal is to act as though I'm all duped and is only backed by HIS personal opinion.
"You actually are so full of venom, spite, and the will to ignore", SKOT, that applies to you, not me. I am not ignoring anything. I'm just saying, you have no backbone for your baseless accusations. I am also saying that you are filled with VENOM and SPITE for LESBIANS (what happened to the GAYS?!) and that you are so adamant to ignore the fact that:
a) Homosexuality is a very small section of society and will remain so. It has always been that way since the Ancient Roman times and I don't see why it ought to change.
b) You ignore anything that cannot be rebutted by your "I'm right coz I say it is". Out of all the points I stated, you decided to target me. Bringing it to a personal level. Since I've been 'duped', my points cannot be trusted? LOL, doesn't work that way. ANY Reader can see that you're basing your ENTIRE IDEA on what YOU think is right, without any proof.
Those characteristics does not apply to me at all. I'm unhappy at you, and I am annoyed at you, simply because you cannot hold a simple debate with proof, and yet, you have the gull to come here, and flame my friends, without any PROOF.
IF I wanted to IGNORE everything, I could. Easily. As a straight girl, I don't need to bother myself with all these things. Homosexuality doesn't bother me. Yet, I chose to understand and stand by my friends. It is you, SKOT, who is the one ignoring everything that doesn't fit into your idea of 'relationship'. Relationship is relationship, You choose somebody to love and that's it.
Until SKOT sees fit to stop acting as though he knows my personality and making wild accusations on how I'm "duped", there will be no more debate. Simply because.. well, its hard to debate against a brick wall. He's just making wild accusations, and I'll just rebut. But SKOT can never get ahead in this 'debate' until he PROVES that he's a "learned, poetic, literate, lateral etc...." person he claims to be and write that essay I'm waiting for. ^^
(Oh, BTW, check the bible. There's incest in the BIBLE. What says you to THAT?! But we're not arguing INCEST here, we're arguing HOMOSEXUALITY, though its becoming evident that you're only against LESBIANISM, and hence, its not even homosexuality anymore. You just don't like lesbians.)
|
|
|
Post by Pam on Sept 20, 2008 8:10:19 GMT -5
Btw, anybody ever notices that SKOT keeps starting his posts with "NONONO!" or "All Wrong!" and then he dives straight into personal opinion without proof or a line of logic. Then he just ignores 80% of whatever I posts?
Just thought to point that out ^^. Lack of Structure, Lack of valid points, full of baseless personal opinion without a good flow of logic and reasoning. Oh, and a hell lot of redundancies.
I'll repeat myself again, for probably the 6th time or something.
STILL WAITING FOR THAT ESSAY! WITH PROOF! AND GOOD WRITING STYLE!
|
|
|
Post by Colin on Sept 20, 2008 8:59:48 GMT -5
I have to say, this is a funny, very one sided debate. I have to thank Pam for linking me here lol.
Might as well get started then eh.
I'm with Pam on this SKOT. This is not because I've known Pam for a very long time, or because shes a close friend. I'm saying this because so far you haven't given anything but a closed minded ramble about how your so hard done by because some woman are homosexuals.
To be honest it sounds to me like you don't have any GOOD reason to hate homosexual woman... other than you were probably rejected by the woman of your dreams just because she was a lesbian.... or you have a crush on Sammy or her girlfriend. Take your pic.
To be perfectly honest i have allot of good friends who are homosexuals... some of the lesbians i do wish were straight but its not my or anyone else's place to judge others or tell them what to do with they're liefs.
Heres a psychology lesson for you. Everyone in the world has had sexual thoughts about the same sex. Those who are able to say they have done so but stayed straight are comfortable with they're sexuality. Those who down right refuse and barrette homosexuals are uncomfortably with they're sexuality. Those who turn to homosexuality scummed to these thoughts and tried it out.
Most of what i say here will be personal knowledge based of experience. Although even you cant deny that allot of it is relevant... If you can then you really are blind and should just give up.
I'm going to bring back this religious thing... just because i can lol. So far the only religion that has abolished homosexuality is Roman Catholic so.. the Pope. In Muslim you are given the free choice to do with your life what you wish. In Hindu there is nothing about sexuality in any scripture. In Buddhism its a way of life not a worshiping higher power so theres no reason to stop it. In Seekism they have the whole love others thing going on. And most of all, since it is the biggest religion... Christianity... LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR!!
A man once said to me: "A friend is a friend who loves you for being you". Kind of generalist and may be somewhat confusing at first, but if you think about it, he was saying love your friends no matter who they are.
I'm not into really long posts so I'm going to end this one here. SKOT, if you can come up with a VALID reason that is NOT just personal belief i will actually congratulate you.
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Sept 20, 2008 15:52:18 GMT -5
Skot, how can you say there isn't such a thing as "homosexuality" and "bisexuality" and only "heterosexuality" exists in this world?
That's like totally saying that there's no such thing as "sundaes" and "smoothies" and there's only "ice cream topped with chocolate fudge" and "ice cream that has been in the blender" and "ice cream".
When I get married and start a family with my said partner, grow old and die, you'll still be there saying, "Oh, Samantha was wrong, she lived being in the wrong and what she was doing has always been wrong. She died being wrong". Okay, so I did, but I have led a fulfilled life while being in the wrong. It makes me happy. That's all I need! I don't need to be "right"!
Stop thinking that you knew what I was or what whoever was! Well guess what! Pam might have been bisexual too and now she knows what she wants, and the same has applied to me. And we're happy.
|
|